Home - News & events - News & events - CaLP publishes collection of research papers to fill the evidence gap around gender and cash

CaLP publishes collection of research papers to fill the evidence gap around gender and cash

On 12 September 2018, CaLP launched ‘Collected Papers on Gender and Cash Transfer Programmes in Humanitarian Contexts.’ Initially made up of the research presented at CaLP’s Gender Symposium, which took place in February 2018, this collection will continue to be updated as new research becomes available.

This first series of papers from UN Women, Concern Worldwide, and the World Food Programme not only do a great job of drawing attention to the evidence gap on the effect of cash-based interventions on gender outcomes in humanitarian settings, but they also lay out the steps the community of practice must take to enact gender-transformative change.

“Women’s empowerment is not a zero-sum game – where FFA programs empowered women, they empowered men too.” (WFP)

 

The insights and recommendations that each paper offers creates a singular message: implementers of cash transfer programs can no longer make the assumption that the provision of cash has a positive impact on gender equality. As practitioners, we should be making a conscious effort to include more gender-responsive components in the design of humanitarian programmes.

“Without appropriate gender considerations, CBIs may fail to reach those left furthest behind and may possibly limit, rather than create an opportunity for greater, gender-transformative change.” (UN Women)

 

This is not to say that there is or should be a ‘one-size fits all’ approach. On the contrary, cash-based interventions (CBIs) must be made to fit a particular context. This is highlighted in the Malawi research commissioned by Concern Worldwide, in which it is recommended that cash transfer programming acknowledge and consider the different vulnerabilities faced by women and men in patrilineal and matrilineal marriages.

“Cash, in itself, is not neutral, but conveys power – a means of control over women.” (Concern Worldwide)

 

Although the evidence base around the effect of cash transfer programming on gender outcomes in humanitarian settings is currently limited and mixed, it does not have to stay that way. CaLP and its members will drive forward the ‘Agenda for Collective Action’ by encouraging collaboration and the sharing of experiences and learning – and this is just the first step.

Read the first volume of papers here and follow us on twitter with the hashtag #GenderCash to stay up to date on the second launch of papers.

Chad in Central Africa has one of the highest levels of hunger in the world. Around 87 percent of its mainly rural population lives below the poverty line. Photo: Giulio d’Adamo/WFP

Related News

Cash is no riskier than other forms of aid. So why do we still treat in-kind like the safer option?

The first in a new series of blogs on cash and voucher assistance and risk, this article from CaLP’s Stefan Bumbacher debunks some common myths around the risk of misappropriation and fraud in CVA.

#GenderCash: One year on from the Nairobi Gender Symposium

Together our members and partners have strengthened the evidence base and advanced the debate around gender and cash and voucher assistance. Looking ahead, how can we ensure we turn talk into action to deliver quality CVA for everyone?

Key donors publish 'Common Donor Approach to humanitarian cash programming' - read the statement in full here.

Donors from Australia, Canada, Denmark, EU/DG ECHO, Germany, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, UK and USA set out a shared vision and principles which will guide their support for cash programming, a significant step towards stronger donor coordination.

See all related news